Reply to 'Tangaroa'

And as for their cruft about the moderators being biased, this website is
essentially private property, and if David has no problem with the way we are
handling them, then we are not biased.

Then 'Tangaroa' is still bias but he just might have a "right" to be so, so do we have the right plus a moral obligation (which he lacks obviously, since he admit to his bias) to speak out.

That 'we' thing is very wierd coming from a person that has this monoply of manipulating the boards.

How are we supposed to handle the situation, anyhow? Having them monopolise the
Political and CE&WN forums is intollerable,

Sure sounds exactly like poster abspwnsyou (for years!) to us. Isn't it what he has been doing with these boards in his dominating of multiple racists threads, spam + hate?

the middle east is only one small part of the world, we cannot
allow a small group of people to bias the discussion towards being about the
situation in the middle east, there are other parts of the world too.

My my my, those members that Tangaroa (& team) have been banning were not posting just about the middle east, but about global terror, which Tangaroa simply doesn't like.

Also, I have a problem with what they post too, them posting polls where
they have a very few options, that are typically biased, then post the option
they pick,

Oh, like Power God's thread for example?

Which that specific poll that Tangaroa is talking about (viewed 123 times before the moderator removed it) was only a reply thread?

[Of course 'Power God' = a.k.a. Seba's ridiculous options-poll, was not removed, since it suits fine with Tangaroa's version of permitted spam on the middle east - despite being only "a very small part of the world".]

I also
recall seeing one log out, then another log in,

1) Not exactly true.
2) Did he ever hear of 'private messaging', 'Instant messaging' , or a concept like signing off and notifying other peers for that matter?
3) This means that 'Tangaroa' has really got his hands full, pity.

all the bans now are done because banned members are not permitted to return to
LiveWire,,

Unless Tangaroa has no PERSONAL thing against them, Shall we list the 'previously banned members' that ARE ALLOWED on LW?

As to 'Tangaroa's "theories" (like TOH) on exactly how many people are connected to us, if it's 3, 4, more or less, etc., we don't think it deserves much of any response.

P.S.
We don't have anything personal against (T-----) 'Tangaroa', solely against his bias behavior, (we don't believe that 'Tangaroa' is really a racist as 'abspwnsyou' & aliases, but bias he is in opinion and in action & even worse, covering for some racists) finally 'straight from the horse's mouth', his own admission of being bias to any poster that it looks to him as a previous poster, or alternatively to anyone that posts any post that is not in accordance to his views.

Speaking of 'apologies', we don't expect (not very soon) an apology from 'Tangaroa' for linking a poster with some intolerance words, to anyone of us, we can not be responsible for any backlash by us spreading the bias and racism covered by guilty 'Tangaroa' & Co.

Question, (since he has a self-convincing 'rationalization' for banning any one of us, notwithstanding,) Does 'Tangaroa' have any remorse for banning members that were/are not connected with us at all ?

No reply needed.